Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Molecular Pain and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Milnacipran inhibits glutamatergic N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor activity in Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons

Tatsuro Kohno14*, Masafumi Kimura2, Mika Sasaki3, Hideaki Obata24, Fumimasa Amaya34 and Shigeru Saito2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 757 Asahimachi, Chuo ku Niigata, 951-8510, Japan

2 Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine

3 Department of Anesthesiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 757 Asahimachi, Chuo ku Niigata, 951-8510, Japan

4 Pain Mechanism Research Group, 757 Asahimachi, Chuo ku Niigata, 951-8510, Japan

For all author emails, please log on.

Molecular Pain 2012, 8:45  doi:10.1186/1744-8069-8-45

Published: 19 June 2012

Abstract

Background

Antidepressants, which are widely used for treatment of chronic pain, are thought to have antinociceptive effects by blockade of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake. However, these drugs also interact with various receptors such as excitatory glutamatergic receptors. Thermal hyperalgesia was induced by intrathecal injection of NMDA in rats. Paw withdrawal latency was measured after intrathecal injection of antidepressants. The effects of antidepressants on the NMDA and AMPA-induced responses were examined in lamina II neurons of rat spinal cord slices using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. The effects of milnacipran followed by application of NMDA on pERK activation were also investigated in the spinal cord.

Results

Intrathecal injection of milnacipran (0.1 μmol), but not citalopram (0.1 μmol) and desipramine (0.1 μmol), followed by intrathecal injection of NMDA (1 μg) suppressed thermal hyperalgesia. Milnacipran (100 μM) reduced the amplitude of NMDA (56 ± 3 %, 64 ± 5 % of control)-, but not AMPA (98 ± 5 %, 97 ± 5 % of control)-mediated currents induced by exogenous application and dorsal root stimulation, respectively. Citalopram (100 μM) and desipramine (30 μM) had no effect on the amplitude of exogenous NMDA-induced currents. The number of pERK-positive neurons in the group treated with milnacipran (100 μM), but not citalopram (100 μM) or desipramine (30 μM), followed by NMDA (100 μM) was significantly lower compared with the NMDA-alone group.

Conclusions

The antinociceptive effect of milnacipran may be dependent on the drug’s direct modulation of NMDA receptors in the superficial dorsal horn. Furthermore, in addition to inhibiting the reuptake of monoamines, glutamate NMDA receptors are also important for analgesia induced by milnacipran.

Keywords:
Antidepressants; N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor; Spinal Analgesia